Legal Opinion
Colonial Bank & Trust Co. v. Matoff
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 28, 1989No. 6223; 6238PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStoughton, J.
The defendant Jesse Monroe appeals from the judgment of the trial court awarding damages to the plaintiff in the total amount of $97,875.72. The plaintiff, Franklin G. Pilicy, administrator of the estate of William Cavanaugh, cross appeals from the judgment rendered against Monroe and also appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the named defendant, Helen Matoff. We find no error in any of the appeals.
On November 24, 1981, Colonial Bank and Trust Company was appointed conservator of the estate of William Cavanaugh.1 In 1982, Colonial brought this action against Matoff and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- DuBose v. CarabettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Jonap v. SilverConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Antonofsky v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Cohen v. ROLL-A-COVER, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- All American Pools, Inc. v. LatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Goytizolo v. MooreConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Croall v. KohlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.