Legal Opinion
Croall v. Kohler
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 8, 2008No. AC 27643PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The plaintiff, Sally A. Croall, administratrix of the estate of Karl B. Kohler, appeals from the judgment of the trial court awarding the defendant, Karl S. Kohler, a setoff against its judgment in favor of the plaintiff.1 Specifically, the plaintiff claims that there was insufficient evidence to support the court’s determination of the amount of the setoff. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*790The following facts are undisputed. The decedent, Karl B. Kohler, had six children, including the parties to this litigation. In 1996, while residing in Madison, the decedent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. NicholasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. BurtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. BurtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Colonial Bank & Trust Co. v. MatoffConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- E & M Custom Homes, LLC v. NegronConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. PerezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Hospital of Central Connecticut v. Neurosurgical Associates, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Schneider v. SchneiderConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Stratford v. WilsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.