Legal Opinion

Jonap v. Silver

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 29, 1983No. (2292)PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.

In a suit for injurious falsehood and invasion of privacy tried to a jury, a verdict on each of six counts in the complaint was returned for the plaintiff. After the defendants filed a motion to set aside the verdicts and a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdicts, the court set aside the verdicts concerning two counts for injurious falsehood and rendered judgment for the defendants on those two counts. On appeal, 1 the defendants claim that the court erred in granting judgment for the plaintiff on the invasion of privacy counts. The plaintiff on cross appeal claims that the court…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. Waterbury Republican-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Johnson v. FlammiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. State v. StankowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Pisel v. Stamford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Giglio v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Romaine v. KallingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. Moore v. Sun Publishing Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Kaye v. Town of ManchesterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  4. Dimmock v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. Honan v. DimyanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API