Legal Opinion

Antonofsky v. Goldberg

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 12, 1957PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

The complaint alleged in substance a rear-end collision at a street intersection between the automobile of the defendant Goldberg, in which the plaintiff was a passenger, and that of the de fendant Gardner, which was following the Goldberg car. It charged that the collision was the result of the negligence and carelessness of both defendants and specified the particular negligent acts of each. At the trial, the plaintiff testified that Goldberg, after starting up when the traffic light at the intersection turned green, “went maybe fifteen, twenty, twenty-five feet, and all of a sudden slammed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Malone v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. Johnson v. ToscanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  3. Rusch v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  4. Cook v. LawlorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  5. Stanley v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. McLaughlin Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Robinson v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. DuBose v. CarabettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API