Legal Opinion
In Re Land
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 5, 1940No. Patent Appeal 4241PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAND, Associate Judge.
The appeal in this case and a related appeal, 109 F.2d 246, were argued together, by reason of the close similarity of the issues presented. We think it necessary in considering the several issues presented in the two appeals to render two opinions.
The appeal in the instant case is from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner in his rejection of claims 11 to 15, inclusive, in the instant application, serial No. 96,-197, filed August 15, 1936, which is a division of another application,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re ByckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- In Re CadyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- In Re BargeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
- In Re CarltonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- In Re FerenciCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Application of Edwin H. Land and Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Benz v. Celeste Fur Dyeing & Dressing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- In re PineoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Application of Edwin H. Land and Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966