Legal Opinion
In Re Ferenci
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 6, 1936No. Patent Appeal 3608PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAND, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming the decision of the examiner requiring division between claims 47 and 48 and the other claims of appellant’s application, all of which are claimed to relate to a bread slicing and wrapping machine. The sole question involved is the correctness of the ruling of the tribunals in' requiring said division.
On the theory that the requirement of division, not acquiesced in by the applicant, amounted to a final rejection of the claims, we have heretofore held the question…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States Ex Rel. Steinmetz v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Remington Rand Business Service, Inc. v. Acme Card System Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Hogg v. EmersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Application of ColemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Benz v. Celeste Fur Dyeing & Dressing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Application of Leo L. HengeholdCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- In Re PattonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.