Legal Opinion
In Re Cady
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 29, 1935No. Patent Appeal 3433PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRETT, Associate Judge.
This appeal, in the form finally presented to us, is from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office rej ecting two claims of a divisional application for patent solely upon the ground of double patenting, the examiner’s decision rejecting them solely upon prior art being, in the same decision, reversed.
On March 19, 1926, appellant filed an application, serial No. 95,820, for patent relating to prepared roofing. The application recited that it was a continuation of ap pellant’s then pending application, serial No. 526,329, filed December 31,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States Ex Rel. Steinmetz v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Elmira & H. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
- Independent Oil Well Cementing Co. v. HalliburtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Helen Russell Pierce, of the Last Will and Testament of George Washington Pierce, Deceased v. Allen B. Du Mont Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- American Communications Co., Inc. v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
- Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. DollCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Pierce v. American Communications Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.