In Re Byck

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Examiner, rejecting claims 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, and 10 of appellant’s application for failure to define anything inventive over the subject-matter claimed in appellant’s prior patent, in view of the prior art.

Claims 1, 3, and 9 are illustrative of the claims in issue and read as follows:

“1. An insulated coil comprising a conductive winding having an insulating coating of infusible, flexible, phenol-fatty oil composition, and an insulating filling for…