Legal Opinion

In re Pineo

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 11, 1946No. 5191PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

The application for a patent involved in this appeal was filed by Orrin Weston Pineo. The application was assigned to the American Cyanamid Company. The said Pineo is deceased.

*1149The claims in the instant application, numbered 6,7, 8, and 9, relate to improvements in flickering beam spectrophotometers.

Upon appeal from the decision of the Primary Examiner, the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirmed the action of the examiner in finally rejecting all of the claims, and it is from the decision of the board that appellant has here appealed.

Claim 6, which is regarded as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. In Re LandCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  3. In re CookCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  4. Adam Hat Stores, Inc. v. LefcoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942
  5. In re PlummerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re HoltCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  2. Reddy Kilowatt, Inc. v. Mid-Carolina Electric Cooperative, Inc., and National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
  3. In re LambertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API