Legal Opinion

In Re Carlton

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 27, 1935No. Patent Appeal 3471PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATFIELD,' Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 44 to 47, inclusive, in appellant’s application for a patent for. an alleged invention relating to a waterproof adhesive or binder, for bonding grit to a “grit abrading surface.”

Claims, more specific than those here involved were allowed.

Claim 44 is illustrative of the appealed claims. It reads: “44. A waterproof adhesive for bonding grit to a grit abrading surface, forming with such grit a flexible waterproof…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re ByckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  2. In Re CadyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Application of ColemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  2. Pierce v. American Communications Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
  3. Application of Homer E. Allen, Deceased, by Helen M. AllenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  4. In Re FerenciCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  5. Application of HornemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API