Legal Opinion
Application of Edwin H. Land and Howard G. Rogers
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided November 23, 1966No. Patent Appeal 7488PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of thirty claims of application serial No. 565,135, filed February 13, 1956, entitled “Photographic Color Processes.” The claims on appeal define both processes and products and are numbered 52-55, 58-61, 63, 64, 66-71, 73-76, 78-86, and 90. The product claims are 69-71 and 82-86. The others are process claims.
The Proceedings Below
The proceedings in the Patent Office were unusual. Appeal was taken to the board from the final rejection and the examiner filed his answer. After…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. BrennerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Application of Christian Zickendraht and Arthur BuehlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Guido H. Stempel, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Application of Robert J. HarryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Duncan Parking Technologies v. Ips Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Riverwood International Corporation v. R.A. Jones & Co., Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- In Re Leonard Kaplan and Wellington Epler WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- United States of America Ex Rel. Shell Oil Company v. Barco Corporation and John BarakatCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.