Legal Opinion
Montella v. City of Ottertail
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 18, 2001No. C9-01-593PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge
In this appeal from a city council’s decision to deny relators’ request for a liquor-license application, relators contend that the city’s decision was arbitrary and capricious and not supported by evidence. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1998, relators Clay and Stacy Montel-la submitted an application to respondent City of Ottertail for a conditional-use permit to operate a business within the city. The application described the business as Brewster’s coffeehouse and ice cream parlor and indicated that the business would serve espresso, cappuccino, cheesecakes, desserts, and hard…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Astleford Equipment Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Resolution Revoking License 000337 West Side Pawn—880 South Robert StreetCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Astleford Equipment Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Nevels v. State, Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Rental Dwelling License held by KhanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re the On-Sale Liquor License, Class BCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Mathews v. City of the Village of Minnetonka BeachCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Great Western Industrial Park, LLC v. Randolph TownshipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Khan v. Minneapolis City CouncilCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.