Legal Opinion

Mathews v. City of the Village of Minnetonka Beach

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 2017No. A16-2032PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHELLHAS, Judge

Relators argue that respondent lacked statutory authority to certify their purported debt to the county auditor for collection with their real estate taxes. Because the city lacked such authority, we reverse.

FACTS

In August 2015, relator landowners Nell Mathews- and Max Hacker’s neighbors began installing a patio in their backyard. Relators believed that the patio extended into and violated the side setback and average minimum building setback requirements. Respondent City of the Village of Minnetonka Beach planning and zoning administrator (the administrator)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. AndaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Welsh v. City of OronoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Staeheli v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  4. County of Washington v. City of Oak Park HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Montella v. City of OttertailCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Baxter v. City of BrainerdCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API