Legal Opinion
Astleford Equipment Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 19, 2001No. C5-99-1612PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.
Astleford Equipment Co., an International truck dealership, brought an action in Hennepin County District Court against Navistar International Transportation Corp., the manufacturer of International trucks.- Astleford alleged that Navistar violated Minnesota’s Heavy and Utility Equipment Manufacturers and Dealers Act (HUEMDA) when it approved another International truck dealership within 10 miles of Astleford’s Burnsville, Minnesota dealership. HUEMDA provides in rele vant part that no equipment manufacturer “may terminate, cancel, fail to renew, or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Jungbluth v. Hometown, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Ralph Remus and Ralph's Standard, Inc., Individually and on Behalf of a Class of Persons Similarly Situated v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. MauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Jasper v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Minnesota Supply Co. v. Raymond Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Harris v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Matter of Welfare of A. J. B.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.