Legal Opinion

Khan v. Minneapolis City Council

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 21, 2010No. A10-187Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Relator Mahmood Khan appeals the decision of respondent Minneapolis City Council to demolish a house that he owns. Because the city council’s decision to demolish the house is unsupported by a current finding that the house constitutes a nuisance, we conclude that the decision was arbitrary. We therefore reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

FACTS

Relator owns 30 to 40 properties in the Twin Cities that he rents to low-income persons. Relator purchased the two-family house that is the subject of this appeal in June 2008. In July 2007, one year…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Montella v. City of OttertailCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Pierce v. Otter Tail CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API