Legal Opinion
In re the Rental Dwelling License held by Khan
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 6, 2011No. A10-2211PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHUMAKER, Judge.
Relator Mahmood Khan challenges respondent City of Minneapolis’s procedure for hiring and selecting administrative hearing officers to conduct hearings on alleged violations of city ordinances respecting residential rentals, contending that the hearing officers have a direct, personal, substantial pecuniary interest in rendering decisions favorable to the city and that this procedure violates his due-process rights. Relator also challenges *135the revocation of his residential rental license, contending that there is a lack of substantial evidence to support the revocation.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mahmood Khan v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Motokazie! Inc. v. Rice CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- City of St. Cloud v. Elissa Winters, Relator.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- In the Matter of the Rental Dwelling License held by Douglas Doty for the Premises at 1068/1072 18th Avenue SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015