Legal Opinion

Great Western Industrial Park, LLC v. Randolph Township

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 8, 2014No. A13-2142Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

After respondent township denied a conditional-use-permit application submitted by an applicant with an option to buy *156relator’s property and the applicant failed to pay the expenses incurred by the township in processing the application, the township passed a resolution under Minn. Stat. § 366.012 that certified the expenses to the county auditor as an unpaid service charge to be collected with relator’s property taxes. In this certiorari appeal, relator argues that respondent misapplied Minn.Stat. § 866.012. We reverse.

FACTS

Recovery Technology Solutions, LLC (RTS) had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. County of Washington v. City of Oak Park HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Halvorson v. County of AnokaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  4. American Bank of St. Paul v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  5. Montella v. City of OttertailCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API