Legal Opinion

United States v. Great Pacific Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 24, 1936No. 3936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Graham, Presiding Judge,

delivered tte opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court. The appellee Great Pacific Co. imported rice at the port of San Francisco, Calif., under the Tariff Act of 1922, on various dates from January 13 to June 2, 1926, which was classified by the collector as milled rice, at two cents per pound under paragraph 727 of said act. The appellee Shui Tai & Co. imported similar rice on March 4, 1931, under the Tariff Act of 1930, which was classified as milled rice at two and one-half cents per pound under paragraph 727 of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Ben Felsenthal & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. Bassichis Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Consolidated Elevator Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  4. Rice Millers' Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. United States v. Washburn-Crosby Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Intercontinental Marble Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  2. Bar Zel Expediters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
  3. Intercontinental Marble Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API