Legal Opinion

United States v. Ben Felsenthal & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 9, 1928No. 2995PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

This appeal involves the classification of seven entries of certain genuine Whitby jet articles, imported by Ben Felsenthal & Co., Wile Importing Co., and John Wanamaker. These articles are designated in the invoices as pendants, crosses, beads, bracelets, brooches, earrings, and stones. On the trial the various protests were abandoned on all articles except the earrings, beads, and stones. All these articles are cut and faceted and ready for use in making jewelry. The *16beads are of various sizes, pierced with holes; the articles denominated as earrings consist of buttons or stones, according…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Nix v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Cadwalader v. ZehSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Marvel v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Butler Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  2. Marshall Field & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  3. Mottahedeh Creations, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. Walter Strassburger & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  5. Intercontinental Marble Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API