Legal Opinion

United States v. Washburn-Crosby Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 19, 1926No. 2750PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The appellee imported from Canada on February 2, 1923, a quantity of wheat in bulk, which it entered as 107,248 bushels of wheat, under paragraph 729 of the Tariff Act of 1922, and 3,302 bushels of screenings, under paragraph 731 of said act. It is contended by the appellant, and conceded by appellee, that the wheat and screenings were mingled at the time of exportation, within the meaning of section 507 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which is as follows:

Sec. 507. Commingling of goods. — Whenever dutiable merchandise and' merchandise which is free of duty or merchandise subject to different rates…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pacific Iron & Metal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Universal Laboratories v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  4. United States v. Great Pacific Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  5. United States v. BrandensteinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API