Rice Millers' Ass'n v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
Rice consigned to William J. Oberle (Inc.), the Levy Rice Milling Co., and John D. Russ was classified by the collector of customs at the port of New Orleans as broken rice, and assessed for duty at one-half of 1 cent per pound under that part of paragraph 727 of the Tariff Act of 1922 which reads as follows:
727. * * * broken rice and rice meal * * * one-half of 1 cent per pound.
The Rice Millers’ Association, an association of American manufacturers, protested against the action of the collector on the ground that the importation was not broken rice and should have been assessed for duty as…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
- United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Bate Refrigerating Co. v. SulzbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Cadwalader v. ZehSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Seeberger v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Daniel Green Shoe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Florsheim Shoe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- Bendix Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Hy-Glow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- United States v. Great Pacific Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.