Legal Opinion

Consolidated Elevator Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 8, 1918No. 1861PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 8072 (T. D. 37247). [Oral argument Dee. 12,1917, by Mr. Severance and Mr. Hanson.]

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Presiding Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of .the court:

The appellants made two separate importations of the commodity entered as flaxseed and screenings.

The testimony shows that flaxseed as it comes from the farms to the elevators contains a percentage of wild buckwheat, a percentage of wild mustard, a percentage of wheat, and small percentages of barley, oats, chaff, and foxtail. There is practically no dirt in the product. These substances, according to the regular commercial practice, are separated from the flaxseed, making a commercial product known as screenings.

These screenings…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Ranlett & StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Seeberger v. Wright & Lawther Oil & Lead Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. United States v. Baker Castor Oil Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. United States v. WaterhouseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Myers v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1905

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  3. Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  4. Universal Laboratories v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  5. United States v. Great Pacific Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API