Legal Opinion
Airflow Technology, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 2, 2007No. Slip Op. 07-52; Court 02-00099PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RIDGWAY, Judge.
At issue in this action is the tariff classification of twenty-one entries of filter media imported from Italy through the Port of Chicago in 1998 and 1999. The imported merchandise is installed in paint spray booths in automotive body shops, in industrial finishing operations, and in the aerospace industry, to filter air flowing into areas where painting operations take place.
The U.S. Customs Service liquidated the imported merchandise under subheading 5911.40.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”), 1 which covers “Textile products and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Airflow Technology, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Outer Circle Products v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Airflow Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Applikon Biotechnology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012