Legal Opinion

Airflow Technology, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 31, 2011No. Slip Op. 11-136; Court 02-00099Errata

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RIDGWAY, Judge:

This test case, on remand from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, concerns the classification of 21 entries of Sperifilt filter media (“Sperifilt”) imported from Italy by plaintiff Airflow Technology, Inc. in 1998 and 1999. See generally Airflow Technology, Inc. v. United States, 524 F.3d 1287 (Fed.Cir.2008) (“Airflow II”). Airflow I granted the Government’s cross-motion for summary judgment, sustaining the determination of the U.S. Customs Service classifying Sperifilt under subheading 5911.40.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. Baxter Healthcare Corporation of Puerto Rico v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. Rocknel Fastener, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. Bull v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API