Legal Opinion

Outer Circle Products v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided January 9, 2009No. Slip Op. 09-3; Court 05-00678PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.

This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to USCIT R. 56. Plaintiff Outer Circle Products (“Plaintiff’ or “Outer Circle”) challenges the classification of its merchandise by the United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) under the 1997 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). 1 Plaintiff maintains that the merchandise is properly classified under subheading 3924.10.50, HTSUS, as “Tableware, Kitchenware ... of plastics: Other.” Customs cross-moves for summary judgment stating that the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  4. Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Outer Circle Products v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Cormorant Shipholding Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
  3. Eni Technology Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
  4. Cormorant Shipholding Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API