Legal Opinion
Airflow Technology, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 28, 2008No. 2007-1384PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
This customs case concerns the proper classification of Sperifilt filter media (“Sperifilt”), a product used to filter dirt and other particles from circulating air. Airflow Technology, Inc. (“Airflow”) appeals the grant of summary judgment by the United States Court of International Trade, holding that the merchandise at issue was properly classified under subheading 5911.40.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). Airflow Tech, Inc. v. United States, 483 F.Supp.2d 1337 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2007). Because we disagree with the Court of International…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Sports Graphics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Cummins Incorporated (Formerly Known as Cummins Engine Company) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Clarendon Marketing, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Deckers Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Lemans Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Arko Foods International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Sigma-Tau Healthscience, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Storewall, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.