Raab v. Casper
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRIEDMAN, Acting P. J.
Plaintiffs and defendants own adjoining foothill tracts acquired through a common grantor. Plaintiffs’ parcel, about 20 acres in size, is longitudinally shaped, with its narrow dimension at the north and south ends. Mr. and Mrs. Casper, the defendants, own two separate parcels immediately to the west, one of three and one-half acres adjoining the northern portion of plaintiffs’ tract, another of four and one-half acres adjoining the southern portion. Plaintiffs’ amended complaint sought a mandatory injunction and damages; it alleged in effect two separate,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. NunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Elliott v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Ernie v. Trinity Lutheran ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Price v. De ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Hirshfield v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Snow v. Western Savings & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Warsaw v. Chicago Metallic Ceilings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Scruby v. Vintage Grapevine, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Gilardi v. HallamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.