Legal Opinion

Raab v. Casper

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 1, 1975No. Civ. 14553PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRIEDMAN, Acting P. J.

Plaintiffs and defendants own adjoining foothill tracts acquired through a common grantor. Plaintiffs’ parcel, about 20 acres in size, is longitudinally shaped, with its narrow dimension at the north and south ends. Mr. and Mrs. Casper, the defendants, own two separate parcels immediately to the west, one of three and one-half acres adjoining the northern portion of plaintiffs’ tract, another of four and one-half acres adjoining the southern portion. Plaintiffs’ amended complaint sought a mandatory injunction and damages; it alleged in effect two separate,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. NunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Elliott v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Ernie v. Trinity Lutheran ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Price v. De ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hirshfield v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Snow v. Western Savings & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Warsaw v. Chicago Metallic Ceilings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Scruby v. Vintage Grapevine, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Gilardi v. HallamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API