Legal Opinion

Gilardi v. Hallam

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1981No. S.F. 24325PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROUSSARD, J.

Defendants appeal from judgment quieting plaintiffs’ title to Lake of the Pines lot 1407, rejecting defendants’ prescription and adverse possession claims to a portion of the lot. The parties stipulated to the facts and submitted the case to the judge without a jury.

More than five years prior to the commencement of the action, defen-; dants’ predecessors, owners of lot 1408, improved a portion of lot 1407 by installing a sidewalk, sprinkler system, nine poplar trees, and a lawn. The sidewalk was used for access to and from a deck and dock on the lake. A survey stake…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Price v. De ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Sorensen v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. West v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Allegretto v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1932

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hirshfield v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Warsaw v. Chicago Metallic Ceilings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Nellie Gail Ranch Owners Ass'n v. McMullinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Windsor Pacific LLC v. Samwood Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Mehdizadeh v. MincerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API