Legal Opinion

People v. Nunn

California Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1956No. Crim. 5748PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

After trial before a jury defendant, an osteopathic physician, was convicted on four counts of prescribing narcotics for a person not under his treatment for a pathology, in violation of section 11163 of the Health and Safety Code.1

He was also convicted of one count of prescribing a narcotic for a person “who represented himself to be an addict,” in violation of section 11164 of the same code.2

He appeals from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.

About 3 p. m. on February 3, 1954, pursuant to instructions from his superior officer, who directed him to use the name “Joe…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Lorenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Hewitt v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. People v. BraddockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. BenfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Ceja v. Rudolph & Sletten, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Knight v. City of CapitolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Patty v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API