Legal Opinion

Hirshfield v. Schwartz

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 15, 2001No. B138714PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WILLHITE, J. *

In this quiet title action, plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s refusal to grant an injunction compelling the removal of certain encroachments by defendants on plaintiffs’ residential property. The court granted the defendants an interest in plaintiffs’ land in order to protect defendants’ use of the disputed areas. The court labeled that interest “an easement.” However, the court recognized that it granted defendants the exclusive right to use the areas in dispute. At issue are: (1) whether the trial court applied the correct test in deciding to deny the injunction;…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Uzyel v. KadishaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Nellie Gail Ranch Owners Ass'n v. McMullinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Toscano v. Greene MusicCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Alpha Mechanical, Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Ellis v. Toshiba America Information Systems., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API