Legal Opinion
State v. Langan
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 22, 1986No. TC 10-80-0083; CA A35228; SC S32380PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.
Defendant, who owns a tavern in Eugene, Oregon, was convicted in 1980 of promoting gambling in violation of ORS 165.122, a Class C felony. See State v. Langan, 293 Or 654, 652 P2d 800 (1982). In 1984, he moved in the circuit court to have the conviction “set aside” pursuant to ORS 137.225. The court denied the motion, and the Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion.
The relevant text of ORS 137.225 provides:
“(1) (a) At any time after the lapse of three years from the date of pronouncement of judgment, any defendant who has fully complied with and performed the sentence of the court * * * by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- McCarthy v. ArndsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- State v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. LanganOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. FishOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. K. P.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. BranamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. TenbuschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.