Legal Opinion

Tredinnick v. Red Cloud Consolidated Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1887No. Nos. 9816, 9817PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mono County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

This is a joint action brought by William Tredennick and twenty-nine other persons, as plaintiffs, to enforce liens for labor severally performed by them in and upon a mining claim known as the Red Cloud Mine. The mine was situate in Mono County, and was owned and worked by the defendant the Red Cloud Consolidated Mining Company. Henry Wads-worth was joined as a defendant in the action, because he had a judgment lien against the mine, which, as alleged by plaintiffs, was subsequent and subordinate to their liens.

In the court below judgment was rendered in favor of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tibbetts v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Haley v. AmestoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Hotaling v. CroniseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Hills v. OhligCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Blackman v. MarsicanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Joyce v. TomasiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Chamberlain v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Harrisburg Lumber Co. v. WashburnOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Willamette Steam Mills Co. v. KremerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API