Legal Opinion
Blackman v. Marsicano
California Supreme Court
Decided November 2, 1882No. 7,452PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from a judgment for the defendants, and an order denying a new trial, in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, Cary, J.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court :
The claim of lien in this case, in stating the terms, time given, and conditions of the contract, used the words, “ cash upon demand, in gold coin of the United States.” This was a substantial compliance with the requirement of the statute. The case of Hooper v. Flood (54 Cal. 221) presented a statement quite different in effect from that here presented.
Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hooper v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tredinnick v. Red Cloud Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1887
- Castagnetto v. Coppertown Mining & Smelting Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
- Kelley v. PloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894