Willamette Steam Mills Co. v. Kremer
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
In August, 1887, the appellants made a contract in writing with one Lane for the construction of a frame building. Lane commenced work under the contract in August, but the contract was not filed in *207the recorders office until October. The court finds that the building was completed February 23,1888, and also that in January it had been accepted by the architect as finished, and that upon such acceptance it had been occupied by the appellants prior to its actual completion. Claims of lien in behalf of the three plaintiffs herein were filed in the recorder’s office on the eighth, fifteenth, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seaton v. G. C. Hixon & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- Harlan v. StufflebeemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Tredinnick v. Red Cloud Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1887
- Northwestern Cement & Concrete Pavement Co. v. Norwegian-Danish Evangelical Lutheran Augsburg SeminarySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Hotaling v. CroniseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Springer v. KroeschellIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Dybvig v. WillisIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Wilcox v. ClowardUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Western Iron Works v. Montana Pulp & Paper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Borello v. Eichler Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.