Legal Opinion

Haley v. Amestoy

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1872No. 3,018PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventeenth Judicial District, Los Angeles County. The defendants had judgment and the plaintiffs appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Belcher, J.:

This is an action of ejectment to recover the possession of certain real property in the County of Los Angeles.

The case was tried by the Court without a jury, and on the last day of the term at which the trial was had findings were filed and judgment entered for the defendants. The plaintiffs excepted to the findings filed for alleged defects therein and moved for a new trial. The Court refused to remedy the defects named and denied the motion, but made and filed certain additional findings at the request of the plaintiffs.

*1351. The original findings are full upon all…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stanley v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. People ex rel. Judson v. ThacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Arambula v. SullivanTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Boone v. RobertIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Tredinnick v. Red Cloud Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Murray v. Tulare Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Smart v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API