Hills v. Ohlig
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.
The only point presented for decision relates to the claim of lien filed in the recorder’s office. The claim as filed states that the plaintiff was by the contract to perform the work and labor and furnish materials for the alteration, construction, and repairing of a certain building, that he did perform the work and labor and furnished materials for the purpose indicated, that it was agreed he was to be paid for the same what they should be reasonably worth, and that they were reasonably worth $601.80.
The law requires that the claim filed…
2Cited by8 opinions
- McClain v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- United States Blowpipe Co. v. SpencerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
- Tredinnick v. Red Cloud Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1887
- Jewell v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Albrecht v. C. C. Foster Lumber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.