Legal Opinion

National Bank v. Dickinson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1918No. 21,326PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Pawnee district court; Albert S. Foulks, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The defendants appeal from a judgment rendered against them on a promissory note taken by the plaintiff for value before maturity in due course, the complaint being that it was nonnegotiable and subject in the hands of the plaintiff to the defense of failure of consideration.

The only question is the negotiability of the note, and this depends upon the proper construction of the following provision thereof:

“We, the makers, sureties, endorsers and guarantors of this note, hereby severally waive presentment for payment, notice of nonpayment,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holliday State Bank v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. City National Bank v. Gunter Bros.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Rossville State Bank v. HesletSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Citizens Bank v. BowdonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Mullendore v. WertzIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McDonald v. MulkeyWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Central National Bank v. EnglerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Conqueror Trust Co. v. DanforthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Townsend v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  5. Bell v. KlusmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API