Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Mulkey

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1926No. 1091PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KiMball, Justice.

This is a direct appeal from a judgment entered on a directed verdict. The parties will be called plaintiff and defendant as in the court below.

The defendant (appellant) was sued as the maker of three promissory notes, each for $1250, payable to S. L. Vance, one dated July 31, 1919, due in one year, the others dated August 16, 1919, due in ten months. The notes are endorsed in blank by the payee. The action was commenced August 19, 1920, the plaintiff in his petition alleging, among other things, that he was then “the bona fide owner and holder in due course” of said notes,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank v. SwanWyoming Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Farmers State Bank v. HaunWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Farmer v. Bank of GraettingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Leach v. UrschelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. McCallum v. DriggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1895

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ohio Oil Co. v. Wyoming AgencyWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Davis v. SchiessWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Richardson Associates v. Lincoln-Devore, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Westring v. Cheyenne National BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Platte County State Bank v. FrantzWyoming Supreme Court · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API