Legal Opinion

City National Bank v. Gunter Bros.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 6, 1903No. 13,131; No. 13,132PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from Butler district court; G. P. Aikman, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J. :

These were actions of replevin brought tor ecover cattle formerly owned by Ed. Noble, in Butler county, and which were sold by him to Gunter Brothers and George D. French & Son. Prior to the sales of the cattle Noble gave to the Goodloe-McClelland Commission Company a promissory note for $7433.88 and at the same time executed a chattel mortgage on the cattle in question to secure the payment of the debt. The following is a copy of the note :

“$7433.88. Kansas City, Kan., May 29, 1900.
“One hundred and eighty-two days after date, without…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Glidden v. HenryIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Clark v. SkeenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  3. Second National Bank v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Woodbury v. RobertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  5. Killam v. SchoepsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Holliday State Bank v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Rossville State Bank v. HesletSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Delaney v. Great Bend Implement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. Sykes v. Citizens' National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Anaheim National Bank v. DolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API