Legal Opinion
Rossville State Bank v. Heslet
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided March 11, 1911No. 16,910PublishedCited by 18 opinions
Appeal from Shawnee district court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Benson, J.:
This action is upon a promissory note, payable to the order of J. M. Heslet, on January 1, 1909, containing the following clause:
“The makers and indorsers of this note hereby severally waive presentment for payment, notice of payment, protest and notice of protest,’ and all exemption that may be allowed by law, and valuation and appraisement laws waived, and each signer and indorser makes the other an agent to extend the time of this note.”
The question for decision is whether the note is a negotiable instrument. It is conceded that if the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Woodbury v. RobertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- City National Bank v. Gunter Bros.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Oyler v. McMurrayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Sykes v. Citizens' National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Coffin v. SpencerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Nickell v. BradshawOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Read v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
- Finley v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Elk Horn Bank & Trust Co. v. SpragginsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Nelson v. SouthworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.