Legal Opinion

Conqueror Trust Co. v. Danforth

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1918No. 21,781PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Reno district court; Frank F. Prigg, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

WEST, J.:

The defendant signed a note with another person, who was the borrower and real principal, and when sued thereon he pleaded that it was agreed between the plaintiff and himself at the time he signed the note that before he could be held thereon or réquired to .pay any portion thereof the plaintiff would exhaust certain chattel-mortgage security given by the principal, and 'that the defendant should be held for the balance only; that afterwards the plaintiff released its security without his knowledge and consent, although the property mortgaged…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. German American State Bank v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Citizens Bank v. BowdonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Fossan v. GibbsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Lonnon v. BatchmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Carter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilhoit v. SeavallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. Macksville State Bank v. EhrlichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Sterling Construction Company v. Humboldt National Bank and W. H. CannonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  4. Demaras v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  5. Graber v. Star Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API