Legal Opinion
Moody v. Provident Irrigation District
California Supreme Court
Decided November 28, 1938No. Sac. 5235PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A hearing was granted in this ease in order that it might be considered in connection with certain other eases dealing with related matters then pending in this court, namely, Provident Land Corp. v. Zumwalt, Sac. 5133 (ante, p. 365 [85 Pac. (2d) 116]), El Camino Irr. Dist. v. El Camino Land Corp., Sac. 5161 (ante, p. 378 [85 Pac. (2d) 123]), and Clough v. Compton-Delevan Irr. Dist., Sac. 5090 (ante, p. 385 [85 Pac. (2d) 126].) Upon a full consideration of the issues in the light of the decisions this day filed in the above-mentioned cases, we have determined to adopt the opinion of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lincoln County v. LuningSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Provident Land Corp. v. ZumwaltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Whiteman v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Hershey v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Freehill v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Youngman v. Nevada Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- May v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District v. KlukkertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Irvine v. BossenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Hair v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.