Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Irvine v. Bossen

California Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1944No. Sac. 5651PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding instituted in the Superior Court of Yuba County to compel the county treasurer of that county to pay to petitioners certain bonds and accrued interest thereon out of funds available in the bond fund of Reclamation District No. 784 on deposit with said treasurer.

Reclamation District No. 784 was organized in 1907 under sections 3446 to 3493 of the Political Code. On January 1, 1921, the district issued bonds in the principal sum of $834,-000 bearing interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum secured by assessments theretofore levied upon lands in the district.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Lincoln County v. LuningSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. County of Cass v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Davenport v. County of DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Barnes v. GlideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Chapman v. JocelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Heyer v. FlaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. May v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API