Legal Opinion

May v. Board of Directors

California Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1949No. Sac. 6030PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the Board of Directors of the El Camino Irrigation District to levy assessments to pay bonds and interest thereon issued by the district.

The district is an existing irrigation district organized under the laws of this state (Wat. Code, div. 11, pt. 1), and embracing an area of 6,548 acres. Respondent is the board of directors of the district. The district, in 1926, pursuant to law, issued valid enforceable bonds in the principal sum of $423,000, which are general obligations of the district. They bore interest at 6 per cent payable semiannually.…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Rees v. City of WatertownSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. City of Galena v. AmySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. County Commissioners v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1869
  5. San Francisco Gas Co. v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Leone v. Medical Bd. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Cockerell v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1954

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API