Legal Opinion

Youngman v. Nevada Irrigation District

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1969No. Sac. No. 7829PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.

Plaintiffs in this action are William Youngman, an employee of the Nevada Irrigation District, and Local 1245 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (hereafter IBEW), which represents employees of the district. Defendants are the district and its directors. Plaintiffs filed a complaint asserting that the district’s employees were entitled to salary increases in 1965 on the basis of merit, that the district had entered into an implied and an express contract to grant such increases, but that it had refused to do so. Defendants filed a demurrer specifying both general and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Silva v. Providence Hospital of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Lemoge Electric v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Hunter v. SparlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Stowe v. Fritzie Hotels, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Scott v. City of Indian WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Klinke v. Famous Recipe Fried Chicken, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Hentzel v. Singer Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API