Legal Opinion
Whiteman v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 26, 1922No. Civ. No. 2522PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was for damages for the death of a minor son of plaintiff, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendants. The portions of the amended complaint necessary to an understanding of the contentions of the parties are as follows:
“That on the 1st day of March, 1918, about the hour of 7 o’clock P. M., the said Boy W. Whiteman was being driven with due and proper care in a ‘Ford Automobile’ by one Jesse Selvester in a Southerly direction, along and over that certain public road and highway, in the County of Shasta, State of California, known as the Anderson-Bedding Boad and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Cole v. La GrangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Talley v. Northern San Diego County Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Crawford v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Falahati v. KondoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Vater v. County of GlennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.