Legal Opinion

Hershey v. Cole

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1933No. Docket No. 4817PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This is an original proceeding based upon a petition filed in this court on the tenth day of October, 1932, wherein the petitioners prayed for a writ of mandate to be directed against Boy B. Cole, as County Treasurer of Yolo County, and as such, Treasurer of Beclamation District No. 1600, commanding him to estimate the amount of money necessary to pay the interest and principal maturing on January 1, 1933, on bonds of Beelamation District No. 1600, secured by what is known as “Assessment No. 1” of said district, in such a manner as not to allow as credits or payments on said assessment,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Wisconsin & Michigan Railway Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Colby v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Merchants National Bank v. Escondido Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Rand v. BossenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Islais Co., Ltd. v. MathesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Moody v. Provident Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. TruslowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Sutter Basin Corp. v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API