Legal Opinion

Blair v. TA-Seattle East No. 176

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 2011No. 83715-5PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

254 P.3d 797 (2011)

171 Wash.2d 342

Maureen T. BLAIR and Kenneth E. Blair, Petitioners,

v.

TA-SEATTLE EAST NO. 176, d/b/a TravelCenters of America, Respondent, and

Oak Hill Capital Management, Inc., Defendant.

No. 83715-5.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued October 26, 2010.

Decided April 21, 2011.

Kenneth Wendell Masters, Masters Law Group PLLC, Bainbridge Island, WA, for Petitioners.

Rodney L. Umberger Jr., Attorney at Law, Daniel W. Ferm, Williams Kastner & Gibbs PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

STEPHENS, J.

¶ 1 This case requires us to consider whether a trial court abused its discretion…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Burnet v. Spokane AmbulanceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Snedigar v. HoddersenWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Snedigar v. HoddersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Keck v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Jones v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Teter v. DeckWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Department of Social & Health Services v. ParvinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Foss Maritime Co. v. BrandewiedeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API