Legal Opinion
Snedigar v. Hoddersen
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 22, 1990No. 56214-8PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Andersen, J.—
Facts of Case
At issue in this case is the constitutionality of a discovery order requiring a political organization to disclose minutes of some of its meetings.
The principal defendant in this case is the Freedom Socialist Party (hereafter referred to as the Party). To use the Party's own description of itself, it is a socialist feminist national political party engaged in organizing for the rights of women, unionists, racial minorities, lesbians and gays, and for the civil liberties of political dissenters. The Party was founded in Seattle in 1966. Richard W. Snedigar, the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- Burnet v. Spokane AmbulanceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Rivers v. Washington State Conference of Mason ContractorsWashington Supreme Court · 2002
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.