Legal Opinion

Teter v. Deck

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 2012No. 85342-8PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.

f Before excluding a witness as a sanction for discovery violations, the trial court must make findings that the violation was willful and prejudicial and was imposed only after explicitly considering less severe sanctions. In this medical negligence case, a pretrial motions judge excluded a key medical expert witness without the required findings. A different judge presided over the jury trial, subsequently granting a new trial on the ground that the exclusion order was a prejudicial error of law. 1

¶2 We hold that the trial judge was well within his discretion in granting the new trial. CR…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Miller v. KennyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Roats v. Blakely Island Maintenance Commission, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Gilmore v. Jefferson County Pub. Transp. Benefit AreaWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Barton v. Department of TransportationWashington Supreme Court · 2013

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API